Content Humanizer

Description

Makes AI-generated content sound genuinely human — not just cleaned up, but alive. Use when content feels robotic, uses too many AI clichés, lacks personality, or reads like it was written by committee. Triggers: 'this sounds like AI', 'make it more human', 'add personality', 'it feels generic', 'sounds robotic', 'fix AI writing', 'inject our voice'. NOT for initial content creation (use conten...

What this skill does

1. 1Audits content for AI tells across seven categories — filler words, hedging chains, em-dash overuse, identical paragraph structure, lack of specificity, false authority, and copy-paste conclusions — with severity scores per finding.
2. 2Removes AI patterns systematically: replacing filler words with direct alternatives, varying sentence rhythm by mixing short and long sentences, and replacing vague claims with specific data or honest attribution.
3. 3Injects the brand's specific voice by reading marketing-context.md or extracting patterns from a provided writing example, applying personal anecdotes, direct address, opinions without apology, and rhythm signatures.
4. 4Flags when the original has too many AI tells for an edit to work and recommends a full rewrite, and when specificity gaps exist that require the user to provide real data before the piece can be credible.

When to use

• A draft was AI-generated and reads like it, with 'leverage,' 'robust,' 'crucial,' and 'furthermore' appearing every few sentences.
• Content passed an SEO brief but your editor says it feels generic and lacks any point of view.
• You want to apply your brand's specific voice to a draft that's structurally correct but tonally flat.
• A piece uses vague claims like 'many companies' and 'studies show' throughout and you want them flagged before publishing.

Frequently asked questions